MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126676828 · doi:10.1086/588612

Further Studies of the Photometric Variability of Bright Pulsating Red Giants

2008· article· en· W2126676828 on OpenAlexaff
John R. Percy, M. Mashintsova, C. O. Nasui, R. Palaniappan, Rajiv Seneviratne, Gregory W. Henry

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotometry (optics)PhysicsAmplitudeAstrophysicsStarsLight curvePhotoelectric effectVariable starWavelengthAstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long-term photoelectric V photometry of 13 pulsating red giants (TV Psc, EG And, RZ Ari, η Gem, V614 Mon, RS Cnc, VY UMa, FS Com, SW Vir, R Lyr, EU Del, V1070 Cyg, and W Cyg) from a robotic telescope (APT) and from the photoelectric photometry program of the American Association of Variable Star Observers has been merged to form data sets that are significantly longer and denser than the subsets, and have been analyzed using Fourier and self-correlation techniques. Improved values of the pulsation periods, and especially of the enigmatic long secondary periods (LSPs), have been determined. Most of the stars also show very slow, small variations in amplitude and mean magnitude on timescales of thousands of days. The amplitude variability has also been studied, using both least-squares and wavelet analysis; the dominant amplitude variability is on a timescale of years. The period of EU Del shows neither long-term secular changes nor random cycle-to-cycle fluctuations. APT VRI photometry for 16 stars has been analyzed: for both the pulsation periods and for the long secondary periods (with one notable exception—EG And), the amplitude decreases with increasing wavelength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the PacificSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207