Fluxes of methylmercury to the water column of a drainage lake: The relative importance of internal and external sources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied fluxes of methylmercury (MeHg) through a Precambrian Shield lake using a mass balance approach. The primary goal of the study was to determine the importance of various sources of MeHg to the water column of the lake. The relative importance of all sources was: in‐lake production >>> inflow from a brown‐water lake with riparian wetlands >>> wet deposition > inflow from an upstream oligotrophic lake > direct inflow from uplands surrounding the lake. MeHg accumulated in the hypolimnion of Lake 240 when oxygen was present. Water‐column sinks for MeHg included photodegradation of MeHg, which was about 3.5 times greater than the loss of MeHg through outflow. At present, there are few studies available on mass balance fluxes of MeHg in lakes, and this is the first study that includes losses of MeHg by photodegradation. The inclusion of photodegradation in this study results in a clear demonstration that in‐lake production of MeHg is very important. In drainage lakes, the relative importance of in‐lake production versus inflow of MeHg from wetlands will vary according to the extent of wetlands in the drainage basin, as well as the volume of precipitation, which produces runoff and transports MeHg from wetlands to downstream lakes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".