Maintien de l’engagement paternel après une rupture conjugale : point de vue de pères vivant en contexte de pauvreté*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La séparation conjugale et la pauvreté menacent doublement le maintien de l’engagement paternel. À partir du discours de pères séparés vivant en contexte de pauvreté et qui se considèrent comme engagés envers leur enfant, l’étude vise à comprendre comment ces pères maintiennent leur engagement envers leur enfant dans l’adversité. Les participants rapportent diverses stratégies pour rester pères dans un contexte où s’additionnent contraintes et pressions imputables tant à la rupture qu’à la pauvreté. De l’analyse se dégagent des éléments qui semblent avoir encouragé la continuité de leur engagement paternel. Une meilleure compréhension des enjeux reliés à ce phénomène contribuera sans doute à alimenter la réflexion et la pratique des intervenants et ainsi à réduire la double pauvreté des enfants qui, en plus d’être économiquement défavorisés, se retrouvent encore trop souvent, après la rupture, privés de leur père.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".