Purification of bovine cathepsin B: proteomic characterization of the different forms and production of specific antibodies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cathepsin B (EC 3.4.22.1) has been highly purified (14,225 fold) from bovine kidney by a rapid procedure that included the preparation of an enriched lysosomal extract, a selective fractionation with ammonium sulphate, size-exclusion chromatography, two cation-exchange chromatographies, and anion-exchange chromatography on diethylaminoethyl-Sephacel. After the last purification step, two hydrolytic peaks against Z-Phe-Arg-AMC were separated from each other, a minor peak corresponding to the cathepsin B single-chain form and a major one representing the double-chain form of cathepsin B. The single-chain form showed a molecular mass of 31 kDa on sodium dodecyl sulphate - polyacrylamide gel electrphoresis (PAGE) under reducing conditions, whereas the heavy chain of the double-chain form appeared as a doublet with molecular masses of 23.4 and 25 kDa, respectively. The identity of the different cathepsin B isoforms and the quality of the final enzyme preparation were confirmed by using two types of antibodies, one against a synthetic peptide sequence and one against purified cathepsin B. The proteomic study confirmed the identity of the different SDS-PAGE protein bands as cathepsin B isoforms and allowed the comparison and study of some structural differences between them at the level of their primary structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".