The central matrix loop drives import of uncoupling protein 1 into mitochondria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The uncoupling protein (UCP1) is a carrier protein of the inner mitochondrial membrane spanning the bilayer six times. It does not contain a typical amino-terminal targeting signal and the mechanism of targeting and insertion is unknown. Here we focus on the biogenesis of UCP1 by analysing the import signals contained within the three repeated units of the protein. The amino-terminal third of the protein can mediate insertion into the outer membrane and therefore acts as artificial targeting signal when fused to DHFR. However, in the context of full-length UCP, the targeting information contained within the first repeated unit is not sufficient to trigger insertion into the outer membrane. Deletion of either the first or third repeated unit from UCP1 did not reduce import into the inner membrane and bound to the outer membrane receptor protein hTom20 with the characteristics of full-length UCP1. Deletion of the second repeat of UCP1 completely abolished all import into the mitochondria. Consistent with this, the central repeat alone was efficiently imported to the inner membrane and bound hTom20 with the characteristics of UCP1. We conclude that the site for binding hTom20 is within the central repeat and that this domain contains the complete targeting signal for directing UCP1 to the inner membrane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".