Nitroglycerin Induces Late Preconditioning Against Myocardial Infarction in Conscious Rabbits Despite Development of Nitrate Tolerance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that the late phase of ischemic preconditioning (PC) can be mimicked by pretreatment with NO donors. The ability of clinically relevant NO donors to induce PC against infarction, however, has not been evaluated. Furthermore, it is unknown whether tolerance to the hemodynamic actions of nitrates also extends to their PC effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Conscious rabbits underwent a 30-minute coronary occlusion and 3 days of reperfusion. A 60-minute intravenous (IV) infusion of nitroglycerin (NTG) ending 1 hour before occlusion reduced infarct size, indicating an early PC effect. When the time interval between NTG infusion and occlusion was extended to 24 or 72 hours, the infarct-sparing action of NTG became even more pronounced, indicating a robust late PC effect. Transdermal NTG patches elicited a late PC effect that was (1) equivalent to that induced by IV NTG, demonstrating the efficacy of transdermal NTG as an alternative form of NTG delivery for inducing late PC, and (2) similar in nitrate-tolerant and -nontolerant rabbits, demonstrating that tolerance does not extend to the PC effects of NTG. CONCLUSIONS: In conscious rabbits, administration of NTG via either the IV or the transdermal route elicits a robust protective effect against infarction that lasts for 72 hours. The magnitude of NTG-induced cardioprotection is equivalent to that observed during the late phase of ischemic PC and is not affected by the development of tolerance. These findings reveal a new action of nitrates and support novel applications of these drugs for protecting the ischemic myocardium in patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".