Bis‐8‐hydroxyquinoline and bis‐8‐hydroxyquinaldine <i>N</i>‐substituted amines: A single methyl group structural difference between the two heterocycles, which modulates the antiproliferative effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract magnified image The synthesis of a series of bis‐8‐hydroxyquinoline‐ and bis‐8‐hydroxyquinaldine‐substituted N‐benzyl or thiophenyl amines and their corresponding bis‐8‐hydroxyquinoline is reported. In vitro growth inhibitory effects of both series have been evaluated. It has been observed that analogs from the bis‐8‐hydroxyquinoline series exert nanomolar range activity, whereas the antiproliferative activity of the corresponding analogs from the bis‐8‐hydroxyquinaldine series was found to be drastically lower. Molecular docking and chemical–physical properties account for these observed growth inhibitory differences between the two series of analogs, which differ only by the presence of a methyl group at the 2 position of the heterocyclic ring. J. Heterocyclic Chem., (2010).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".