Spontaneous breathing through an inspiratory impedance threshold device augments cardiac index and stroke volume index in a pediatric porcine model of hemorrhagic hypovolemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic shock secondary to trauma is associated with poor survival. The impedance threshold device (ITD) has been shown to improve blood pressure and survival rates in an adult porcine model of hemorrhagic hypovolemia. Pediatric hemodynamics, anatomy, and physiology differ from adults. Evaluation of the ITD has not been previously assessed in a pediatric porcine model of hypovolemia induced by hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ITD-assisted breathing, with and without positive end-expiratory pressure, will improve key hemodynamic parameters following hypovolemia induced by hemorrhage in a pediatric porcine model. METHODS: Intubated, anesthetized, hemodynamically stable, spontaneously breathing piglets were rapidly bled 40% of their calculated blood volume. Piglets' hemodynamic and intrathoracic pressures were continuously monitored during 10-min normovolemic baseline, bleed to hypotensive baseline, 10-min ITD-assisted breathing, 10 mins without ITD, 10-min ITD-assisted breathing randomized with or without positive end-expiratory pressure (3 cm H2O), 10 mins without ITD, reinfusion of shed blood, 10-min baseline following return to normovolemia. The ITD had an inspiratory cracking pressure of -7 cm H2O. Transthoracic echocardiographic parameters were measured at the end of each 10-min period. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline assessments between groups. Systolic blood pressure, cardiac index, and stroke volume index were significantly greater during ITD-assisted breathing. There was a trend toward increased left ventricular end-diastolic dimension during ITD use. Heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, left ventricular end-systolic dimension, and shortening fraction did not change significantly during ITD-assisted breathing. There was equivalent improvement in systolic blood pressure, cardiac index, and stroke volume index, when the ITD alone and ITD plus positive end-expiratory pressure were used. CONCLUSIONS: ITD-assisted breathing significantly augmented systolic blood pressure, cardiac index, and stroke volume index in this pediatric porcine model of hemorrhagic hypovolemia. These effects appear related to increased left ventricular preload and not by increased systemic vascular resistance or heart rate. These beneficial effects of ITD-assisted breathing are not changed by the addition of positive end-expiratory pressures of 3 cm H2O.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".