MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spontaneous breathing through an inspiratory impedance threshold device augments cardiac index and stroke volume index in a pediatric porcine model of hemorrhagic hypovolemia

2004· article· en· W2126863430 on OpenAlex
Bradley S. Marino, Demetris Yannopoulos, Garðar Sigurðsson, Lillian Lai, Catherine Cho, Andrew N. Redington, Susan C. Nicolson, Vinay Nadkarni, Keith G. Lurie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicineHypovolemiaAnesthesiaStroke volumeBlood pressureCardiac outputCardiologyCardiac indexHemodynamicsInternal medicineHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic shock secondary to trauma is associated with poor survival. The impedance threshold device (ITD) has been shown to improve blood pressure and survival rates in an adult porcine model of hemorrhagic hypovolemia. Pediatric hemodynamics, anatomy, and physiology differ from adults. Evaluation of the ITD has not been previously assessed in a pediatric porcine model of hypovolemia induced by hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ITD-assisted breathing, with and without positive end-expiratory pressure, will improve key hemodynamic parameters following hypovolemia induced by hemorrhage in a pediatric porcine model. METHODS: Intubated, anesthetized, hemodynamically stable, spontaneously breathing piglets were rapidly bled 40% of their calculated blood volume. Piglets' hemodynamic and intrathoracic pressures were continuously monitored during 10-min normovolemic baseline, bleed to hypotensive baseline, 10-min ITD-assisted breathing, 10 mins without ITD, 10-min ITD-assisted breathing randomized with or without positive end-expiratory pressure (3 cm H2O), 10 mins without ITD, reinfusion of shed blood, 10-min baseline following return to normovolemia. The ITD had an inspiratory cracking pressure of -7 cm H2O. Transthoracic echocardiographic parameters were measured at the end of each 10-min period. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline assessments between groups. Systolic blood pressure, cardiac index, and stroke volume index were significantly greater during ITD-assisted breathing. There was a trend toward increased left ventricular end-diastolic dimension during ITD use. Heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, left ventricular end-systolic dimension, and shortening fraction did not change significantly during ITD-assisted breathing. There was equivalent improvement in systolic blood pressure, cardiac index, and stroke volume index, when the ITD alone and ITD plus positive end-expiratory pressure were used. CONCLUSIONS: ITD-assisted breathing significantly augmented systolic blood pressure, cardiac index, and stroke volume index in this pediatric porcine model of hemorrhagic hypovolemia. These effects appear related to increased left ventricular preload and not by increased systemic vascular resistance or heart rate. These beneficial effects of ITD-assisted breathing are not changed by the addition of positive end-expiratory pressures of 3 cm H2O.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it