MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126872078 · doi:10.1017/s0021859604004599

Modelling transport of amino acids into the red blood cells of sheep

2004· article· en· W2126872078 on OpenAlex
Grietje Holtrop, H. Lapierre, G. E. Lobley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Agricultural Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vitroChemistryRed blood cellAmino acidIn vivoBlood plasmaBiochemistryBiophysicsBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mathematical models have been developed that describe possible sources of the free amino acids (AA) present in the red blood cells (RBC). These models reflect three hypotheses, namely (i) direct transport between plasma and RBC, (ii) enhanced direct transport by deformation of the RBC during passage through capillaries and (iii) direct exchange between tissues and RBC. The latter implies that RBC samples from appropriate blood vessels might offer an alternative to tissue biopsies in protein turnover studies. These compartmental models were tested against data from ovine studies. For hypothesis (i), a single dose of [U- 13 C] AA was added to blood in vitro . The rate of disappearance of label from plasma was low ( k P =0·0009–0·004 per min), indicative of slow direct transport between plasma and RBC. For hypotheses (ii) and (iii), a single dose of [1- 13 C] AA was administered intravenously to sheep. Label disappeared from plasma quicker ( k P =0·33–0·53 per min) than in vitro , with the appearance of labelled AA in the RBC higher than could be explained from direct transport alone. The model reflecting enhanced exchange of free AA between plasma and RBC due to capillary action over-predicted RBC enrichments and pool sizes by up to five-fold. The third hypothesis, namely that AA in the RBC are predominantly derived from exchange with tissues, gave better agreement. This model suggested that at least 0·63 of the AA in the RBC might come from exchange with tissue. To investigate whether peripheral tissues (skin and muscle) might be involved in such exchange, an additional experiment was conducted in five sheep prepared with arterio-venous catheters across the hindquarters. [1- 13 C, 15 N] leucine was continuously infused, with both blood samples and tissue biopsies taken. The ratio of [1- 13 C] leucine to [1- 13 C, 15 N] leucine was 1·8–2·9 fold greater in muscle and skin compared with arterial plasma, indicative of intracellular transamination. If free leucine exchanged directly between tissues and RBC then the ratio should be higher in RBC isolated from venal caval compared with arterial blood. In practice, the ratios from the RBC in aorta and vena cava were similar ( P =0·30). These findings suggest that, for leucine, RBC enrichments do not form an alternative to tissue biopsies to estimate the enrichment of the precursor pool in protein turnover studies of the hindquarter. Instead, other tissues must play a more important role in the exchange of AA with the RBC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it