Bibliographic record
Abstract
The GP Services Committee (GPSC) is a joint Ministry of Health – BC Medical Association committee with the mandate of improving Primary Care in British Columbia. The Practice Support Program (PSP) was developed to encourage and support Family Physicians to undertake QI initiatives. While the initial modules targeted family practice, in December 2010, the PSP expanded to a broader program designed to integrate Family Practice, Palliative Care, Specialty Care and Home and Community Care around improving the provision of end-of-life services for patients and their families. Two major components of this module are: (1) Advance Care Planning using the ‘My Voice’ tool developed by BC Fraser Health Authority (2) Foundational concepts for identification, assessment and planning taken from the UK Gold Standards Framework. Provincial legislation on ‘Advance Directives’ is to be implemented in BC later in 2011. Family physicians, specialists, their staff and front line health care providers are being trained and supported by Regional Support Teams to facilitate colleagues undertaking the End-of-Life PSP module across BC. The goal is to improve the use of ACP, communications, collaboration of care provided by the full healthcare. Tools have been developed to assist family physicians in shifting to a palliative approach to care and increase their comfort in undertaking advanced care planning with patients identified on their registry. This poster board will highlight both the PSP process as it promotes Advance Care Planning in BC as well as demonstrate some of the electronic tools that have been developed to support End-of-Life Care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".