The Revelation of Administrative Case System in Taiwan to the Transformation of Administrative Case Guidance System in Mainland China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compared with legal systems in other countries and regions, Cross-Strait legal systems are more portable and referential to each other because of the impact of civil law and the homology of law culture. The administrative case guidance system in mainland China is facing a need of transformation and reformation. The administrative case system in Taiwan has played an important role in the development, improvement and innovation of the administrative law theory. It will delineate a revelation to the construction of administrative case guidance system in mainland China, including mode selection, properties, efficacy and other aspects. Key words: Adminis trat ive case system; Administrative case guidance system; Cross-Strait Resume Le systeme juridique du detroit, basee sur l’impact de la loi civile et la culture juridique de l’homologie, par rapport a d’autres pays et regions, le systeme juridique plus portable et peut apprendre de la nature. Systeme de guidage administratif en Chine fait face a la necessite de changement et de transformation. Systeme de Taiwan le droit administratif dans la theorie le cas du developpement administratif, l’amelioration et l’innovation a joue un role enorme, il sera en Chine du mode de selection des cas le systeme administratif, la nature, l’efficacite et d’autres aspects de la construction de notre inspiration. Mots-cles: Systeme de decision d’administratif; Systeme de Guidage des affaires administrativen; Detroit
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".