Analysis of the wheat and <b><i>Puccinia triticina</i></b> (leaf rust) proteomes during a susceptible host‐pathogen interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wheat leaf rust is caused by the fungus Puccinia triticina. The genetics of resistance follows the gene-for-gene hypothesis, and thus the presence or absence of a single host resistance gene renders a plant resistant or susceptible to a leaf rust race bearing the corresponding avirulence gene. To investigate some of the changes in the proteomes of both host and pathogen during disease development, a susceptible line of wheat infected with a virulent race of leaf rust were compared to mock-inoculated wheat using 2-DE (with IEF pH 4-8) and MS. Up-regulated protein spots were excised and analyzed by MALDI-QqTOF MS/MS, followed by cross-species protein identification. Where possible MS/MS spectra were matched to homologous proteins in the NCBI database or to fungal ESTs encoding putative proteins. Searching was done using the MASCOT search engine. Remaining unmatched spectra were then sequenced de novo and queried against the NCBInr database using the BLAST and MS BLAST tools. A total of 32 consistently up-regulated proteins were examined from the gels representing the 9-day post-infection proteome in susceptible plants. Of these 7 are host proteins, 22 are fungal proteins of known or hypothetical function and 3 are unknown proteins of putative fungal origin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".