Primary chromosomal rearrangements of leukemia are frequently accompanied by extensive submicroscopic deletions and may lead to altered prognosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BCR/ABL fluorescent in situ hybridization study of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia(+) (Ph(+)) acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) indicated that approximately 9% of patients exhibited an atypical hybridization pattern consistent with a submicroscopic deletion of the 5' region of ABL and the 3' region of the BCR genes on the 9q(+) chromosome. The CML patients with deletions had a shorter survival time and a high relapse rate following bone marrow transplant. Since deletions are associated with both Ph(+) CML and ALL, it seemed probable that other leukemia-associated genomic rearrangements may also have submicroscopic deletions. This hypothesis was confirmed by the detection of deletions of the 3' regions of the CBFB and the MLL genes in AML M4 patients with inv(16) and in patients with ALL and AML associated with MLL gene translocations, respectively. In contrast, analysis of the AML M3 group of patients and AML M2 showed that similar large deletions were not frequently associated with the t(15;17) or t(8;21) translocations. Analysis of sequence data from each of the breakpoint regions suggested that large submicroscopic deletions occur in regions with a high overall density of Alu sequence repeats. These findings are the first to show that the process of deletion formation is not disease specific in leukemia and also implicate that the presence of repetitive DNA in the vicinity of breakpoint regions may facilitate the generation of submicroscopic deletions. Such deletions could lead to the loss of one or more genes, and the associated haploinsufficiency may result in the observed differences in clinical behavior. (Blood. 2001;97:3581-3588)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".