Glomerular territories in the olfactory bulb from the larval stage of the sea lamprey <i>Petromyzon marinus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to investigate the spatial organization of olfactory glomeruli and of substances relevant to olfactory sensory neuron activity in the developing agnathan, the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus. A 45-kD protein immunoreactive to G(olf), a cAMP-dependent olfactory G protein, was present in the ciliary fraction of sea lamprey olfactory epithelium and in olfactory sensory neurons of larval and adult sea lampreys. This result implies that G(olf) expression was present during early vertebrate evolution or evolved in parallel in gnathostome and agnathostome vertebrates. Serial sectioning of the olfactory bulb revealed a consistent pattern of olfactory glomeruli stained by GS1B(4) lectin and by anterograde labeling with fluorescent dextran. These glomerular territories included the dorsal cluster, dorsal ring, anterior plexus, lateral chain, medial glomeruli, ventral ring, and ventral cluster. The dorsal, anterior, lateral, and ventral glomeruli contained olfactory sensory axon terminals that were G(olf)-immunoreactive. However, a specific subset, the medial glomeruli, did not display this immunoreactivity. Olfactory glomeruli in the dorsal hemisphere of the olfactory bulb, the dorsal cluster, dorsal ring, anterior plexus, lateral chain, and medial glomeruli, were seen adjacent to 5HT-immunoreactive fibers. However, glomeruli in the ventral hemisphere, the ventral ring, and ventral cluster did not display this association. The presence of specific glomerular territories and discrete glomerular subsets with substances relevant to olfactory sensory neuron activity suggest a spatial organization of information flow in the lamprey olfactory pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".