Relaciones interculturales a través de las artesanías. Alcances del Proyecto Rihla
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Andalucía y Marruecos comparten un pasado histórico común y pertenecen a un espacio geográfico de características muy similares. Los movimientos migratorios entre las dos orillas han fructificado en diferentes aspectos culturales que pueden ser aprovechados como recursos para el desarrollo socioeconómico de ambas orillas. Entre estos destaca la artesanía -especialmente las artes decorativas y ornamentales-, que ha desempeñado un papel prioritario dentro de las culturas andaluza y norteafricana. Las influencias en este terreno han sido recíprocas, ya que en Andalucía los artesanos de origen musulmán pronto transmitieron sus conocimientos a discípulos hispanomusulmanes y estos a su vez a los cristianos, produciéndose una evolución de las técnicas y los motivos decorativos. Desvelar estos aspectos de la cultura inmaterial que aún hoy persisten entre nosotros y que se configuran como una auténtica herencia cultural común constituye el objetivo del proyecto RIHLA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".