Revision of the Stenodemini with a Review of the Included Genera (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An argument is made for the monophyly of the tribe Stenodemini China 1943 based on a character discussion treating the pretarsus, metepisternal scent efferent system, external cuticular ultrastructure, male and female genitalia, metafemoral trichobothria, and external morphology of head and pronotum. As a result, a proposal is presented to subsume Pithanini Douglas and Scott 1865 with Stenodemini. A cladistic analysis of the nominate stenodemine genera based on 54 characters is conducted. The revised Stenodemini includes 32 genera. The following junior subjective generic synonyms are proposed: Notostiropsis Poppius 1914 = Ebutius Distant 1909; Penacoris Cavalho and Rosas 1966 = Stenodema Laporte 1832; and Trigonotyliscus Carvalho 1975 = Trigonotylus Fieber 1858. A lectotype is designated for Ebutius bellus Distant 1909. Chaetomiris Bliven 1973 is treated as a nomen dubium. A key to the genera and a diagnosis of each recognized genus of the reconstituted Stenodemini are presented. A list of the included species, with a summary of their distributions based on faunal regions is given for each genus. Selected photomicrographs, scanning micrographs, and illustrations of structural features of stenodemine genera are provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".