E4F1: a novel candidate factor for mediating BMI1 function in primitive hematopoietic cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Polycomb group gene Bmi1 is essential for the proliferation of neural and hematopoietic stem cells. Much remains to be learned about the pathways involved in the severe hematopoietic phenotype observed in Bmi1 homozygous mutant mice except for the fact that loss of p53 or concomitant loss of p16(Ink4a) and p19(Arf) functions achieves only a partial rescue. Here we report the identification of E4F1, an inhibitor of cellular proliferation, as a novel BMI1-interacting partner in hematopoietic cells. We provide evidence that Bmi1 and E4f1 genetically interact in the hematopoietic compartment to regulate cellular proliferation. Most importantly, we demonstrate that reduction of E4f1 levels through RNA interference mediated knockdown is sufficient to rescue the clonogenic and repopulating ability of Bmi1(-/-) hematopoietic cells up to 3 mo post-transplantation. Using cell lines and MEF, we also demonstrate that INK4A/ARF and p53 are not essential for functional interaction between Bmi1 and E4f1. Together, these findings identify E4F1 as a key modulator of BMI1 activity in primitive hematopoietic cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".