It's Not All Smooth Muscle: Non-Smooth-Muscle Elements in Control of Resistance to Airflow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To achieve gas exchange, inspired air must pass through an intricate and dynamic tracheobronchial tree. The tree offers resistance to airflow, and increased resistance is the most important functional change in lung disease. Numerous mechanisms contribute to increased resistance by causing airway narrowing, closure, occlusion, and/or obliteration. Although airway smooth muscle (ASM) contraction and shortening are an important cause of increased resistance, non-ASM elements can also contribute. Nonmuscle elements can modify the amount of airway narrowing for any given level of ASM shortening and the amount of shortening for a given level of ASM activation. In this review, we outline the physiological basis for airflow resistance and describe how changes in the lung parenchyma, the airways, and their luminal contents can contribute to increased airflow resistance. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms and consequences of increased airway resistance is vital to our attempts to alleviate the enormous burden of suffering caused by obstructive lung diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".