MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127186136 · doi:10.1586/14760584.2013.840094

<i>Cryptococcus</i>antigens and immune responses: implications for a vaccine

2013· review· en· W2127186136 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ashok K. Chaturvedi, Floyd L. Wormley

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Vaccines · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsCryptococcosisCryptococcus gattiiImmunologyOutbreakMedicineDiseaseIncidence (geometry)Mortality rateVirologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cryptococcosis is a fungal disease primarily occurring in immunocompromised individuals, such as AIDS patients, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, cryptococcosis can occur within immunocompetent populations as observed during an outbreak in Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada, the Pacific Northwest and other regions of the USA and in Mediterranean Europe. Mortality rates due to cryptococcosis have significantly declined in economically developed countries since the widespread implementation of highly active antiretroviral therapy. However, the incidence and mortality of this disease remains high in economically undeveloped areas in Africa and Asia where HIV infections are high and availability of HAART is limited. The continuing AIDS epidemic coupled with the increased usage of immunosuppressive drugs to prevent organ transplant rejection or to treat autoimmune diseases has resulted in an increase in individuals at risk for developing cryptococcosis. The purpose of this review is to discuss the need, challenges and potential for developing vaccines against cryptococcosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of VaccinesSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207