MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127283242 · doi:10.1139/w06-140

Temporal expression of<i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i>respiratory terminal oxidases

2007· article· en· W2127283242 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
James A. Megehee, Michael D. Lundrigan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycobacterium smegmatisOxidase testCytochrome c oxidaseBiochemistryMutantWild typeElectron Transport Complex IVBiologyCytochromeMolecular biologyOperonEnzymeChemistryGeneMycobacterium tuberculosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terminal oxidases provide the final step in aerobic respiration by reducing oxygen. The mycobacteria possess two terminal oxidases: a cytochrome c aa3 type and a quinol bd type. We previously isolated a bd-type oxidase knockout mutant of Mycobacterium smegmatis that allowed for functional analysis of the aa3 type without the contribution of bd-type activity. Growth of M. smegmatis LR222 and JAM1 (LR222bd::kan) was monitored and the cytochrome content at different time points examined. No difference in aerobic growth was observed between M. smegmatis LR222 and JAM1. Membranes were obtained from these cultures and the oxidase concentrations were calculated from their spectrum. Although the mutant was producing only one oxidase type, this oxidase did not reach wild-type levels of expression, suggesting an additional mechanism for energizing the membrane. Moreover, the concentration of both oxidases in the wild-type strain dropped when cultures entered stationary phase, which was not the case for the aa3-type oxidase of the mutant strain. This oxidase remained at a constant concentration post mid-log phase. RNase protection assays also demonstrated late growth phase dependent message expression of the bd oxidase and that the subunits I and II genes were cotranscribed as an operon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicMycobacterium research and diagnosisFrench-language works237,207