Cortical hyperexcitability in post-traumatic stress disorder secondary to minor accidental head trauma: a neurophysiologic study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We applied paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (pTMS) to patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) secondary to minor accidental head trauma. Our purpose was to determine the potential abnormality of motor cortex excitability in this pathologic condition. METHODS: pTMS stimulation, according to the conditioning-test paradigm employing interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 1-6 ms, was used to investigate intracortical inhibition in control subjects and patients with PTSD. The study population consisted of 14 patients who had developed PTSD following minor head trauma, 12 healthy volunteers without a clinical history of head trauma and 11 healthy subjects who had reported accidental minor head trauma 1-4 months before the study. This clinical electrophysiologic study was performed at the Department of Neuroscience, University of Rome "Tor Vergata." RESULTS: All patients with PTSD exhibited a significantly lower motor evoked potential (MEP) inhibition than controls at 2 ms, 3 ms and 4 ms ISI. The statistical analysis of the pTMS protocol showed a significant effect (F2,36 = 25.63, p < 0.001) of the factor "group," because patients with PTSD showed a mean conditioned MEP amplitude higher than that observed in both control groups for all 6 ISIs analyzed. The "ISI" factor was also significant (F5,180 = 89.85, Greenhouse-Geisser epsilon = 0.35; p < 0.001), with the mean conditioned MEP amplitude increasing from 22.5% to 127.8% as the ISI increased from 1 ms to 6 ms. Finally, the interaction of group with ISI was also significant (F10,180 = 8.97, p < 0.001), showing that the condition of PTSD secondary to head trauma was able to affect the MEP amplitude at different ISIs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that PTSD can give rise to abnormalities in intracortical inhibition. Our results provide further evidence that alterations in cortical inhibitory circuits may underlie specific forms of neuroticism in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".