MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127402788 · doi:10.1109/cca.2007.4389376

A Nonlinear Geometric Fault Detection and Isolation Approach for Almost-Lighter-Than-Air-Vehicles

2007· article· en· W2127402788 on OpenAlexaff
Nader Meskin, Tao Jiang, E. Sobhani, K. Khorasani, C.A. Rabbath

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œproceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications/˜The œproceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Control Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault detection and isolationActuatorNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Channel (broadcasting)Computer scienceFault (geology)Isolation (microbiology)Filtering theoryEngineeringAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the problem of actuator fault detection and isolation (FDI) for almost-lighter-than-air-vehicles (ALTAVs) is investigated using a nonlinear geometric approach. Due to the particular dynamics of the ALTAV, six detection filters are designed for FDI of the four input channels of the ALTAV. Four of the detection filters are designed such that each input channel affects only one of the actuators and the other two detection filters are affected by the corresponding two input channels. Using an appropriate combination of detection filters, one may detect and isolate the faults in all the input channels associated with single as well as simultaneous multiple actuators faults. Numerous simulation results demonstrate and show the excellent performance of the designed nonlinear detection filters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œproceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications/˜The œproceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Control ApplicationsSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207