MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127402788 · doi:10.1109/cca.2007.4389376

A Nonlinear Geometric Fault Detection and Isolation Approach for Almost-Lighter-Than-Air-Vehicles

2007· article· en· W2127402788 on OpenAlexaff
Nader Meskin, Tao Jiang, E. Sobhani, K. Khorasani, C.A. Rabbath

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œproceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications/˜The œproceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Control Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault detection and isolationActuatorNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Channel (broadcasting)Computer scienceFault (geology)Isolation (microbiology)Filtering theoryEngineeringAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the problem of actuator fault detection and isolation (FDI) for almost-lighter-than-air-vehicles (ALTAVs) is investigated using a nonlinear geometric approach. Due to the particular dynamics of the ALTAV, six detection filters are designed for FDI of the four input channels of the ALTAV. Four of the detection filters are designed such that each input channel affects only one of the actuators and the other two detection filters are affected by the corresponding two input channels. Using an appropriate combination of detection filters, one may detect and isolate the faults in all the input channels associated with single as well as simultaneous multiple actuators faults. Numerous simulation results demonstrate and show the excellent performance of the designed nonlinear detection filters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œproceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications/˜The œproceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Control ApplicationsSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207