MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127442418 · doi:10.1038/ng.209

Collaborative genome-wide association analysis supports a role for ANK3 and CACNA1C in bipolar disorder

2008· article· en· W2127442418 on OpenAlexaff
Manuel A. R. Ferreira, Michael O‘Donovan, Yan Meng, Ian Jones, Douglas M. Ruderfer, Lisa Jones, Jinbo Fan, George Kirov, Roy H. Perlis, Elaine Green, Jordan W. Smoller, Detelina Grozeva, Jennifer Stone, Ivan Nikolov, Kimberly Chambert, Marian L. Hamshere, Vishwajit L. Nimgaonkar, Valentina Moskvina, Michael E. Thase, Sian Caesar, Jennifer Franklin, Katherine Gordon‐Smith, Kristin G. Ardlie, Stacey Gabriel, Christine Fraser, Brendan Blumenstiel, Matthew DeFelice, Gerome Breen, Michael Gill, Derek W. Morris, Amanda Elkin, Walter Muir, Kevin A. McGhee, Richard Williamson, Donald J. MacIntyre, Alan Maclean, David St Clair, Michelle Robinson, M. Van Beck, Ana Carla Pereira, Radhika Kandaswamy, Andrew McQuillin, David Collier, Nicholas Bass, Allan H. Young, Jacob Lawrence, I. Nicol Ferrier, Adebayo Anjorin, Anne Farmer, David Curtis, Edward M. Scolnick, Peter McGuffin, Mark J. Daly, Aiden Corvin, Peter Holmans, Douglas Blackwood, Hugh Gurling, Michael J. Owen, Shaun Purcell, Pamela Sklar, Nick Craddock

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Genetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Mental HealthMedical Research CouncilSylvan C. Herman FoundationBroad InstituteWellcome TrustScience Foundation IrelandNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
KeywordsBipolar disorderGenome-wide association studyAnkyrinBiologyGenetic associationGeneticsCalcium channelProtein subunitBipolar II disorderG alpha subunitGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismNeuroscienceInternal medicineGenotypeMedicineCalciumCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,258
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature GeneticsSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207