MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Leukocytes And Bacteria In Men With Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome Compared To Asymptomatic Controls

2003· article· en· W2127461426 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsProstatitisMedicineAsymptomaticChronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndromeSemenUrineInternal medicineChronic bacterial prostatitisPelvic painPopulationGastroenterologyHigh-power fieldCohortUrinary systemProstateUrologyImmunologySurgeryAndrologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Chronic prostatitis has been traditionally characterized by inflammation and/or infection of the prostate gland, objectively categorized by white blood cells and cultured bacteria in prostate specific specimens. We compared leukocyte counts and localization rates for bacterial cultures of segmented urine samples (VB1, VB2, VB3), expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) and semen in men diagnosed with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) to men without pelvic pain (controls). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 463 men enrolled in the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Cohort study and 121 age matched men without urinary symptoms had leukocyte counts performed and 5-day bacterial cultures on specimens obtained from a standard 4-glass test (VB1, VB2, EPS, VB3) and semen. All risk factor comparisons between case and control analyses were tested using generalized Mantel-Haenszel methods, and multivariable models were developed using logistic regression methods, adjusting for clustering by clinical center within both methods. RESULTS: Men with CP/CPPS had statistically higher leukocyte counts in all segmented urine samples and EPS, but not in semen compared to asymptomatic control men. However, the control population also had a high prevalence of leukocytes. Of the men with CP/CPPS 50% and 32% had 5 or more, or 10 or more white blood cells (WBCs) per high power field, respectively, in EPS compared to 40% and 20% of the control population. Similarly, 32% and 14% of the patients with CP/CPPS had 5 or more, or 10 or more WBCs per high power field in VB3 compared to 19% and 11% in the control population. Localization of uropathogenic bacteria in EPS, VB3 and/or semen was similar in men with CP/CPPS (8.0%) and asymptomatic men (8.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Men with CP/CPPS have significantly higher leukocyte counts in all segmented urine samples and EPS but not in semen as compared to controls. There is no difference in rates of localization of bacterial cultures for men with CP/CPPS compared to control men. The high prevalence of WBCs and positive bacterial cultures in the asymptomatic control population raises questions about the clinical usefulness of the standard 4-glass test as a diagnostic tool in men with CP/CPPS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it