MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127502178 · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgh027

Risk of non-medullary thyroid cancer influenced by polymorphic variation in the thyroglobulin gene

2003· article· en· W2127502178 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Athena Matakidou

Bibliographic record

VenueCarcinogenesis · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThyroid cancerOdds ratioMedicineThyroidInternal medicineThyroglobulinMedullary thyroid cancerGenotypePopulationEndocrinologyAlleleOncologyGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Benign thyroid disorders are strong risk factors for non-medullary thyroid cancer (NMTC). Germline variation in Tg (thyroglobulin) and TSHR (thyroid stimulating hormone receptor) confers an increased risk of benign thyroid disorders. To explore the hypothesis that polymorphic variation in these genes affects the risk of NMTC we compared the frequency of TgQ2511R, TSHR-P52T and TSHR-D727E genotypes in two series of NMTC cases and controls (group 1, Canadian 102 cases and 102 controls; group 2, British 202 cases and 298 controls). No significant association was seen with TSHR-P52T and TSHR-D727E genotypes and risk of NMTC. However, the frequency of the R-allele of TgQ2511R was over represented in NMTC cases in both study populations. The odds ratios associated with hetero- and homozygosity for the R-allele were 1.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.5) and 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.3), respectively. Although the risk of NMTC associated with the TgQ2511R R-allele is modest, its high prevalence in the general population suggests it may make a significant contribution to the incidence of NMTC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarcinogenesisSame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207