Field of Glory: The Battle of Crysler's Farm, 1813
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The War of 1812 continues to attract historical attention. In the last decade alone, nearly two hundred works appeared relating to the war, over sixty of them books. These two books show that the interest continues and the quality is reaching new levels. The war has always fascinated Canadians, and in recent years several works have been turned out by Canadian historians. Donald E. Graves may be the most competent of the modern Canadian military historians. His preference, as shown in his earlier works, has been to bore into a single battle and relate it in great detail. Having completed a study of the battle of Lundy's Lane, Graves now turns to a more obscure battle at Crysler's Farm in November 1813. Because it is obscure, Graves spends a lot of time setting the stage for the battle (he does not get to the actual battle until the second half of the book). For the background, Graves utilizes secondary American sources heavily, but he also brings in many Canadian sources that enliven and enrich his narrative. Graves also pays great attention to details, both in his narrative and in appendices, relating to organization, ammunition and weapons, order of battle, and strength of each side. While the average reader might find some of these details tedious, military buffs will be delighted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".