MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127577800 · doi:10.1149/2.086302jes

Oxygen Reduction Reaction Using MnO<sub>2</sub>Nanotubes/Nitrogen-Doped Exfoliated Graphene Hybrid Catalyst for Li-O<sub>2</sub>Battery Applications

2012· article· en· W2127577800 on OpenAlexafffund
Hey Woong Park, Dong Un Lee, Linda F. Nazar, Zhongwei Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGrapheneCatalysisElectrolyteBattery (electricity)Carbon nanotubeLithium (medication)OxygenAqueous solutionMaterials scienceCurrent densityCathodeChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryCarbon fibersComposite numberConductivityChemistryElectrodeNanotechnologyPhysical chemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrogen-doped thermally exfoliated graphene (NExG) synthesized by a simple one-step method combined with α-MnO2 nanotubes (NT) is employed as air cathode materials for lithium oxygen (Li-O2) battery applications. α-MnO2 NT/NExG composite is shown to demonstrate excellent oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity in an aprotic non-aqueous electrolyte Li-O2 cell resulting in 2.92 V at the current density of 100 mA g−1, discharge current density of 7.2 A g−1 at 2.2 V, and the maximum power density of 15.8 W g−1 based on carbon mass. This excellent performance of the composite suggests that not only α-MnO2 NT exhibits a remarkable catalytic activity for ORR, but also NExG with a large surface area and high electrical conductivity is capable of catalyzing ORR, demonstrating an outstanding hybrid effect in an aprotic non-aqueous electrolyte Li-O2 cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207