MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127608249 · doi:10.1194/jlr.m400252-jlr200

Evidence of QTLs on chromosomes 1q42 and 8q24 for LDL-cholesterol and apoB levels in the HERITAGE Family Study

2004· article· en· W2127608249 on OpenAlexaff
Mary F. Feitosa, Ingrid B. Borecki, Tuomo Rankinen, Treva Rice, Jean-Pierre Després, Jacques Gagnon, Arthur S. Leon, James S. Skinner, Claude Bouchard, Michael A. Province, D. C. Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lipid Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsCentre de Recherche sur les Biotechnologies MarinesUniversité LavalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsApolipoprotein BGeneticsBiologyQuantitative trait locusGenetic linkageCholesterolGeneEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genome-wide multipoint linkage analyses were performed to identify chromosomal regions harboring genes influencing LDL-cholesterol, total apolipoprotein B (apoB), and LDL-apoB levels using 654 markers. They were assessed in a sedentary state (baseline) and after a 20 week endurance training program. Strong evidence for two quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for baseline levels was found. There is linkage evidence in black families on chromosomes 1q41-q44 [at marker D1S2860, 238 centimorgan (cM), with a maximum log of the odds (LOD) score of 3.7 for LDL-apoB] and in white families on chromosome 8q24 (at marker D8S1774, 142 cM, with LOD scores of 3.6, 3.3, and 2.5 for baseline LDL-cholesterol, LDL-apoB, and apoB, respectively). There were no strong signals for the lipoprotein training responses (as computed as the difference in posttraining minus baseline levels). In conclusion, QTLs for baseline apoB and LDL-cholesterol levels on chromosomes 1q41-q44 (in blacks) and 8q24 (in whites) were found. As there are no known strong candidate genes in these regions for lipids, follow-up studies to determine the source of those signals are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lipid ResearchSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207