Comparison of structure and magnetic properties of Mn–Zn ferrite mechanochemically synthesized under argon and oxygen atmospheres
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nanocrystalline Mn 0.5 Zn 0.5 Fe 2 O 4 ferrite was successfully synthesized by ball milling a powder mixture of MnO, ZnO, and Fe 2 O 3 under argon and oxygen atmospheres. The effects of the milling time, milling atmosphere, and annealing temperature on the milled powders were examined. X-ray diffractometry (XRD), scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy were used to evaluate the powder particle structure. The XRD results indicated that after 20 h of ball milling the MnO–ZnO–Fe 2 O 3 powder reacted with a solid-state diffusion reaction route producing Mn–Zn ferrite nanoparticles in the milled samples with both atmospheres. However, some Fe 3 O 4 phase alongside Mn–Zn ferrite, both being spinel-phase, was detected for 40 h milled powders in the argon atmosphere. Those milled powders in the argon atmosphere had smaller crystallite size than the other ones. In the final stage of milling (40 h), the average crystallite size and lattice strain were 20 nm and 0.51%, respectively, ans 25 nm and 0.48% for milled samples in the argon and oxygen atmospheres, respectively. Vibrating sample magnetometer results indicate that the saturation magnetization and coercivity were 34 emu/g and 30 Oe, 18 emu/g and 70 Oe, respectively, for the 40 h milled samples in argon and oxygen, which were annealed at 800 °C for 2 h.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it