MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127646874 · doi:10.1088/0268-1242/21/7/006

Arrays of periodic submicron conductive links in Si covered by SiO<sub>2</sub>formed by polarized laser irradiation

2006· article· en· W2127646874 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSemiconductor Science and Technology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsIrradiationLaserElectrical conductorMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsSiliconOpticsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arrays of periodic submicron conductive links were fabricated in silicon covered by SiO2 when polarized frequency doubled Nd:YAG pulsed laser irradiation is focused on the gap between two highly doped regions. The principle of the process is based on the fact that the laser forms periodic melting in silicon, thus inducing preferential dopant diffusion and creating an array of fine conductive links between the highly doped regions. A scanning capacitance microscopy (SCM) was employed to detect these submicron structures and to measure their electrical properties. It was found that between two and seven submicron conductive links are observed in a focused spot size of 3 µm and their number depends only on the laser intensity ranging from 3.10 W to 3.75 W, while their average width (151–300 nm) and depth (108–147 nm) strongly depends on both the laser intensity and number of laser pulses. The resistances of these links are between 363–493 Ω and the effective average doping levels are from 1.5 × 1018 to 2.4 × 1019 cm−3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it