Design and validation of a pulsatile perfusion bioreactor for 3D high cell density cultures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents the design and validation of a pulsatile flow perfusion bioreactor able to provide a suitable environment for 3D high cell density cultures for tissue engineering applications. Our bioreactor system is mobile, does not require the use of traditional cell culture incubators and is easy to sterilize. It provides real-time monitoring and stable control of pH, dissolved oxygen concentration, temperature, pressure, pulsation frequency, and flow rate. In this bioreactor system, cells are cultured in a gel within a chamber perfused by a culture medium fed by hollow fibers. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) suspended in fibrin were found to be living, making connections and proliferating up to five to six times their initial seeding number after a 48-h culture period. Cells were uniformly dispersed within the 14.40 mm x 17.46 mm x 6.35 mm chamber. A larger fraction of the cells suspended in 6.35-mm thick gels and cultured in a traditional CO(2) incubator were found to be round and dead [corrected]. In control experiments carried out in a traditional cell culture incubator, the scarcely found living cells were mostly on top of the gels, while cells cultured under perfusion bioreactor conditions were found to be alive and uniformly distributed across the gel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".