MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127770257 · doi:10.5539/jgg.v6n4p122

Challenges of Water Crisis on Women’s Socio-Economic Activities in the Buea Municipality, Cameroon

2014· article· en· W2127770257 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lotsmart Fonjong, Martha Abongwa Ngekwi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geography and Geology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusEconomic welfareStratified samplingWelfareWater qualityBasic needsSocioeconomicsSustainable developmentEconomic growthClean waterGeographyBusinessWater resource managementPovertyNatural resource economicsEconomicsPolitical scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringSociologyPopulationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although water is a basic human right, it is also essential for achieving sustainable development and povertyalleviation. The economic cost of water crisis can be very severe for women in low income societies whoseactivities revolve around water, ranging from domestic to economic needs. This paper looks at the watersituation of a rapidly growing town, Buea, in the SW Region of Cameroon, and how it poses a challenge towomen’s socio-economic efforts. The results presented are based on analysis of field data collected from 177water users and stakeholders of the study area through a stratified random sampling technique and analyzed withthe help of SPSS and Epi softwares. Findings reveal that the water crisis in Buea is human- induced and womenare the most affected because their socioeconomic lives are highly dependent on water. While this situationdirectly affects the quality/quantity of water, and the amount of time women spend on water collection, it alsohas far-reaching implications on the socio-economic welfare of the municipality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geography and GeologySame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207