Free Vibration Analysis of Cylindrical Shells Supported on Parts of the Edges
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerical studies of the free vibration analysis of open skewed circular cylindrical shells supported only on selected segments of the straight edges are presented in this paper. The uniform thickness shell geometry is defined by the radius, subtended angle and the length, all with reference to the middle surface. The open skewed circular cylindrical shell is modeled by dividing the reference surface into few patches and introducing upon them displacement nodal points and also five degrees of freedom in accordance with the first order shear deformable shell theory are assigned to each of these nodal points. The free vibration analysis of the shell structure is performed using two types of interpolating polynomials, viz. simple high order algebraic and Bezier, respectively. The number of nodal points per patch determines the order of the displacement polynomials. As a consequence considerably high-order polynomials are used in computations for the accurately converged results. Convergence studies are carried out to validate the method for cases in which the skewed cylindrical shell is supported only on the third of each of the two straight edges. Additionally, the performance of the present method is assessed and discussed by comparing frequency results with those from standard finite element methods using linear and parabolic quadrilateral elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it