Calmodulin Regulation of Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Cardiac Myocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Calmodulin (CaM) as a ubiquitous Ca2+ sensor interacts with multiple key molecules involved in excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. In the present study, we report that adenoviral expression of a mutant CaM lacking all of its four Ca2+-binding sites, CaM(1-4), at a level 6.5-fold over endogenous CaM markedly increases the amplitude and abbreviates the decay time of Ca2+ transients and contraction in cultured rat ventricular myocytes. To determine the underlying mechanisms, we examined the properties of L-type Ca2+ channels, Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), and phospholamban (PLB) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). We found that CaM(1-4) expression markedly augmented L-type Ca2+ current amplitude and slowed its inactivation. Surprisingly, overexpression of CaM(1-4) increased CaMKII activity and phosphorylation of PLB-Thr-17. Moreover, CaM(1-4) elevated diastolic Ca2+ and caffeine-labile Ca2+ content of the SR. Inhibition of CaMKII by KN-93 or a myristoylated autocamtide-2 related inhibitory peptide prevented the aforementioned PLB phosphorylation and reversed the positive inotropic and relaxant effects, indicating that CaMKII is essential to CaM(1-4) actions. These results demonstrate that CaM modulates Ca2+ influx, SR Ca2+ release, and Ca2+ recycling during cardiac EC coupling. A novel finding of this study is that expression of a Ca2+-insensitive CaM mutant can lead to activation of CaMKII in cardiac myocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".