Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Overload/Arthritis in the Varus Knee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is a widely accepted procedure for the treatment of medial compartment arthritis of the knee. Compared with closing wedge HTO, however, the outcomes of OWHTO reported in the literature are incomplete. PURPOSE: To identify the positive and negative prognostic factors related to the outcomes of OWHTO through an evaluation of midterm study results and survivorship analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: From January 2001 to December 2009, a total of 141 consecutive OWHTOs were performed in 123 patients. Only patients with symptomatic medial knee overload/arthritis were included. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and at every follow-up visit with (1) the Knee Society score, (2) the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, (3) another self-evaluation scale, (4) long-leg radiographs, and (5) plain radiographs. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were investigated to find an association with the outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 123 patients, 15 were lost to follow-up, and 24 were excluded from the study, leaving 84 patients (99 OWHTOs) for the present study. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 54.5 ± 9.2 years. The mean follow-up was 51.5 ± 23.8 months. The Knee Society and WOMAC scores significantly improved after surgery (P < .001). The variables significantly related to a poor outcome were (1) age >56 years (P = .008) and (2) postoperative knee flexion <120° (P < .001); the variables significantly related to a good outcome were (1) Ahlbäck grade 0 arthritis of the medial compartment (P < .001) and (2) excellent preoperative Knee Society score (P < .001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a survival rate of 98.7% at 5 years and 75.9% at 7.5 years. CONCLUSION: With correct indications, OWHTO is a reliable procedure for medial knee arthritis/overload. The outcomes reported are similar to those from other studies, although the variables related to outcomes are slightly different.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".