Variable accretion as a mechanism for brightness variations in T Tauri S
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context. The southern “infrared companion” of T Tau is known to show strong photometric variations of several magnitudes on timescales of years, as well as more modest 1 mag variations on timescales as short as one week. The physical mechanism driving these variations is debated, intrinsic luminosity variations due to a variable accretion rate were initially proposed, but later challenged in favor of apparent fluctuations due to time-variable foreground extinction.Aims. We seek to investigate the nature of the observed photometric variability. Based on simple geometric arguments and basic physics laws, a minimum variability timescale can be derived for which variable extinction is a viable mechanism. Because this timescale increases rapidly with wavelength, observations at long wavelengths provide the strongest constraints.Methods. We used VISIR at the VLT to image the T Tau system at two epochs in February 2008, separated by 3.94 days. In addition we compiled an extensive set of near- and mid-infrared photometric data from the literature, supplemented by a number of previously unpublished measurements, and constructed light curves for the various system components. We constructed a 2D radiative transfer model for the disk of T Tau Sa, consisting of a passively irradiated dusty outer part and a central, actively accreting component.Results. Our VISIR data reveal a +26 ± 2% change in the T Tau S/T Tau N flux ratio at 12.8 μm within four days, which can be attributed to a brightening of T Tau Sa. Variable extinction can be excluded as a viable mechanism for the observed flux variation based on the short timescale and the long observing wavelength. We show that also the high long-term photometric variability and its associated color–magnitude behavior can be plausibly explained with variable accretion. However, variable extinction is also a viable mechanism for the long-term variability, and a combination of both mechanisms may be required to explain the collective photometric variability of Sa.Conclusions. We conclude that the observed short-term variability is caused by a variable accretion luminosity in T Tau Sa, which leads to substantial fluctuations in the irradiation of the disk surface and thus induces rapid variations in the disk surface temperature and IR brightness. Both variable accretion and variable foreground extinction can plausibly explain the long-term color and brightness variations. We suggest that the periods of high and variable brightness of Sa that we witnessed in the early and late 1990s were due to enhanced accretion induced by the periastron passage of Sb, which gravitationally perturbed the Sa disk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".