Regional Centroid-Moment-Tensor Analysis for Earthquakes in Canada and Adjacent Regions: An Update
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| May 01, 2012 Regional Centroid-Moment-Tensor Analysis for Earthquakes in Canada and Adjacent Regions: An Update Honn Kao; Honn Kao Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) 1Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Geoscience Centre, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Shao-Ju Shan; Shao-Ju Shan Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) 1Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Geoscience Centre, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Allison Bent; Allison Bent Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) 2Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Catherine Woodgold; Catherine Woodgold Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) 2Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Garry Rogers; Garry Rogers Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) 1Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Geoscience Centre, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John F. Cassidy; John F. Cassidy Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) 1Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Geoscience Centre, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John Ristau John Ristau Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) 3GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Honn Kao 1Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Geoscience Centre, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) Shao-Ju Shan 1Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Geoscience Centre, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) Allison Bent 2Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) Catherine Woodgold 2Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) Garry Rogers 1Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Geoscience Centre, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) John F. Cassidy 1Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Geoscience Centre, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) John Ristau 3GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand Geological Survey of Canada Pacific Geoscience Centre 9860 West Saanich Road Sidney, BC V8L 4B2, Canadahonn.kao@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca (H. K.) Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1938-2057 Print ISSN: 0895-0695 © 2012 Seismological Research Letters (2012) 83 (3): 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.83.3.505 Article history First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Honn Kao, Shao-Ju Shan, Allison Bent, Catherine Woodgold, Garry Rogers, John F. Cassidy, John Ristau; Regional Centroid-Moment-Tensor Analysis for Earthquakes in Canada and Adjacent Regions: An Update. Seismological Research Letters 2012;; 83 (3): 505–515. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.83.3.505 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search Reliable determination of earthquake source parameters is a subject of fundamental importance for seismological research. It also provides critical observational constraints to the study of deformation and stress within the lithosphere. A comprehensive catalog of earthquake source parameters is not only essential to the understanding of global and regional tectonics, but also offers critical information on geological structures that may have engineering, economic, and hazard implications. In addition to the origin time, hypocenter, and magnitude, an earthquake's source parameters include its focal mechanism, source time function, and the spatiotemporal distribution of slip. However, unless the source dimension is considerably larger... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it