Loss of Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) Gene Reverses Sepsis-induced Inhibition of Lung Host Defense in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: After surviving the initial hyperinflammatory phase, patients with sepsis display features consistent with immunosuppression, which renders the host susceptible to nosocomial infections, in particular bacterial pneumonia. Suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling implicated in endotoxin tolerance. OBJECTIVES: The present study sought to determine the role of ST2 in modulating host defense in the lung during sepsis, using a murine model of cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-induced sepsis followed by a secondary infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa via the airways. METHODS: CLP or sham surgery was performed on BALB/c wild-type (WT) and ST2 knockout (KO) mice, and 24 hours later animals were challenged with 10(8) live P. aeruginosa. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CLP mice demonstrated impaired clearance of Pseudomonas from their lungs and reduced pulmonary levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-6 compared with sham mice. After CLP, ST2KO mice with secondary pneumonia displayed a strongly improved survival and a better bacterial clearance compared with WT mice, which was accompanied by enhanced lung inflammation. CLP did not influence the responsiveness of alveolar macrophages toward P. aeruginosa ex vivo irrespective of the st2 genotype. In contrast, CLP resulted in a reduced capacity of WT CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells to produce IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α, an immune suppressive effect that was not seen in ST2KO mice. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that gene products of ST2 contribute to the immune-compromised state during sepsis and the ensuing disturbed homeostasis of lung host defense.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".