Osmotic stress activates Rac and Cdc42 in neutrophils: role in hypertonicity-induced actin polymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertonicity inhibits a variety of neutrophil functions through poorly defined mechanisms. Our earlier studies suggest that osmotically induced actin polymerization and cytoskeleton remodeling is a key component in the hypertonic block of exocytosis and cell movement. To gain insight into the signaling mechanisms underlying the hyperosmotic F-actin response, we investigated whether hypertonicity stimulates Rac and Cdc42 and, if so, whether their activation contributes to the hypertonic rise in F-actin. Using a recently developed pull-down assay that specifically captures the active forms of these small GTPases, we found that hypertonicity caused an ~2.5- and ~7.2-fold activation of Rac and Cdc42, respectively. This response was rapid and sustained. Small GTPase activation was not mediated by the osmotic stimulation of Src kinases, heterotrimeric G proteins, or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Interestingly, an increase in intracellular ionic strength was sufficient to activate Rac even in the absence of cell shrinkage. Inhibition of Rac and Cdc42 by Clostridium difficile toxin B substantially reduced but did not abolish the hypertonicity-induced F-actin response. Thus hypertonicity is a potent activator of Rac and Cdc42, and this effect seems to play an important but not exclusive role in the hyperosmolarity-triggered cytoskeleton remodeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".