The Social Economy Sector in China: A Case of Farmers' Specialized Technology Association (FSTA) in Yuanshi County Hebei Province/LE SECTEUR DE L'ÉCONOMIE SOCIALE EN CHINE: LE CAS DE L'ASSOCIATION DE TECHNOLOGIE SPECIALISEE DES PAYSANS DANS LA REGION YUANSHI DE LA PROVINCE DU HEBEI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since 1980,the Chinese government began to reform Chinese society, A characteristic of this reform era is the emergence of numerous NPOs in the economic, cultural and political spheres independent of both the State and the Chinese Communist Party. This paper considers the role of Social Economy in China and the possibility of future development with the case of Farmers’ Specialized Technology Association (FSTA) in Yuanshi County Hebei Province. Key words: Social Economy Sector, Organizational Framework, Property Rights System Resume: Depuis 1980, le gouvernement chinois a commence la reforme sociale. Une caracteristique de cette ere de reforme est l’emergence de nombreuses organisations non-lucratives dans les domaines economique, culturel et politique qui sont independantes de l’Etat et du Parti Communiste Chinois. Cet article considere le role de l’economie sociale en Chine et la possibilite du developpement futur avec le cas de l’Association de technologie specialisee dans la region Yuanshi de la province du Hebei. Mots-Cles: secteur de l’economie sociale, cadre organisationnel, systeme des droits de propriete
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".