MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128170108 · doi:10.1175/2007jcli1718.1

Effects of Serial Dependence and Large-Scale Tropospheric Circulation on Midlatitude North American Terrestrial Carbon Dioxide Exchange

2008· article· en· W2128170108 on OpenAlexafffund
Robbie A. Hember, Peter M. Lafleur

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Climate · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsTrent UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric SciencesNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationBIOCAP Canada
KeywordsClimatologyMiddle latitudesEnvironmental scienceNorth Atlantic oscillationFlux (metallurgy)TroposphereEddy covarianceAtmospheric sciencesEcosystemGeologyOceanographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Linear regression was used to relate modes of tropospheric circulation variability to estimates of gross ecosystem production (GEP) and ecosystem respiration (ER) measured at 14 midlatitude North American eddy covariance (EC) towers. The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) exhibited a north–south gradient in its effect on fluxes, with negative influence on fluxes at central and northeastern stations and positive influence on fluxes at southeastern stations. During spring, average values of GEP and ER within the northern “cold” sector decreased by 22 and 12 g C m−2 (18% and 11%), respectively, in response to a unit increase (+1 standard deviation) in the expansion coefficient of the NAO mode. Despite a northward advancement of the “warm” sector during summer, GEP and ER remained negatively correlated with the NAO at northern stations, decreasing on average by 48 and 30 g C m−2 (8% and 6%), respectively. During spring, the North Pacific Oscillation (NPO) reduced GEP and ER at central and northeastern stations on average by 20 and 7 g C m−2 (16% and 6%) and increased GEP and ER at southern and west coast stations on average by 53 and 49 g C m−2 (12% and 17%) in response to a unit increase in the NPO. This pattern persisted into summer, only shifted northward, with flux decreases of 19 and 24 g C m−2 (3% and 5%) at northern stations and increases of 72 and 82 g C m−2 (9% and 16%) at central stations. The direction of the flux response in each case was supported by synoptic conditions inferred from composite maps of North American circulation and gridded surface air temperature anomalies. The magnitude and timing of the relationships differed between stations and was attributed to differences in geographic location and plant functional type. Difficulty in the interpretation of significant correlations was attributed to the short sample length of typical EC records and unmodeled variability, including, for example, modulation by the NAO during high NPO. Despite these limitations, long-term monitoring EC stations show promise in characterizing the regional and ecosystem-specific carbon cycle response to low-frequency modes of tropospheric circulation variability and may play a critical role in validating ecosystem model responses to such phenomena.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ClimateSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207