Strigolactones seem not to be involved in the nonsusceptibilty of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) nonhost plants to AM fungi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although most land plants are hosts for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), a small number of plant families are arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) nonhosts. There are indications that strigolactone levels in root exudates of AM nonhost plants are lower than in AM host plants, and it has been shown that in the strigolactone-deficient rms1 mutant (ccd8) of the AM host plant pea, the AMF colonization of roots is highly reduced. Application of the synthetic strigolactone analogue GR24 to this strigolactones-deficient mutant restored AMF colonization of roots. Our objective was to determine whether the application of GR24 to AM nonhost plants can affect their susceptibility to AMF. To test whether GR24 affects AMF colonization in our experimental system, we added GR24 to the strigolactone-deficient pea ccd8 mutant. Application of GR24 increased AMF colonization in the pea mutant to a similar level as in the pea wild type with normal strigolactone levels, showing clearly that in our experimental setup, application of the GR24 positively affects AMF colonization in strigolactone-deficient plants. Observation of cleared roots after application of GR24 to four AM nonhost plant species inoculated with the AMF Glomus intraradices showed that colonization did not occur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".