New framework for volumetric constitutive behaviour of compacted unsaturated soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Volumetric behaviour is a fundamental consideration in unsaturated soil constitutive modelling. It is more complex than when the soil is saturated, as unsaturated soils exhibit a range of responses such as swelling and collapse under wetting and shrinkage and cracking during drying. While significant advances have been made, it is still difficult to generally explain all patterns of behaviour. This paper presents a new framework for modelling volumetric response of unsaturated soils with emphasis on compacted soils. The framework uses void ratio (e), moisture ratio (e w ), and net stress (p) as the main constitutive variables and suction as a dependent variable. This choice of e w as a main constitutive variable is theoretically sound and is more attractive than the use of suction, which is relatively difficult to measure and displays significant hysteresis during drying and wetting. The framework incorporates the well-known compaction curve making it easily applicable to practical situations. Within the overall e–e w –p space, the operative space is constrained by three main surfaces; namely, loading–wetting state boundary surface, tensile failure surface, and the saturated plane. The conceptual basis for these state surfaces is described and the framework is qualitatively validated against observed behaviour of compacted soils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".