MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128201506 · doi:10.1017/s0008423907071090

La comparaison dans les sciences sociales : pratiques et méthodes

2007· article· fr· W2128201506 on OpenAlexaff
François-Pierre Gingras

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Political Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La comparaison dans les sciences sociales : pratiques et méthodes, Vigour, Cécile, Paris, La découverte, 2005, 335 pages. Cet ouvrage, rédigé par une sociologue française rattachée à l'Institut des sciences sociales du politique (une unité du CNRS), se présente comme un “ guide repère ” sur la comparaison en sciences sociales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.375
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.506
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3750.506
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0170.028
Science and technology studies0.0040.015
Scholarly communication0.0180.018
Open science0.0050.009
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Political ScienceSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207