MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128268181 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.5857

Using Career Education to Help Students Build and Articulate Employability Skills

2015· article· en· W2128268181 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Lynda Peto, Carolyn Geddert

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomedical and Engineering Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEmployabilityInternshipGraduation (instrument)Medical educationPsychologyCareer developmentVocational educationWork (physics)Value (mathematics)PedagogyEngineeringMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For 80% of first-year students, the highestmotivators for attending University are related to gettinga good job and preparing for a career. Research hasshown that post-secondary students with some careergoals and engaged in career development experienceshave higher levels of engagement, academic performance,mental health, and persistence. Employers are placing agreater emphasis on a student’s skills and experience intheir recruitment process. No longer does a Universitydegree guarantee employment success upon graduation.Career education can provide the foundation andframework to help students make these connections andbe successful in transitioning into the world of work. Byunderstanding what employers’ value and knowing howto build and gain skills and experiences while inUniversity, students can enhance their employabilityoutcomes and successfully launch into their career upongraduation.The Faculty of Engineering along with Career Services atthe University of Manitoba, have developed an innovativepartnership to deliver career education embedded inrequired 1st and 2nd year Engineering courses. Theprogram called “Your Career Starts Here” wasintroduced in the Fall 2013 term in Design inEngineering (Eng 1430) and Technical Communications(Eng 2010) courses. The learning outcomes of theseinteractive modules for students include: recognizingcareer development as a life-long process of learning;identifying and describing employability skills; identifyingwhat employers value in the recruitment process;matching skills with an employer’s needs as well asidentifying gaps; and reflecting on opportunities atUniversity to build, enhance and develop skills andexperiences. Academic courses, work experiences,cooperative education and internship programs, researchexperiences, and involvement in campus groups and cocurricularprogramming are identified as careerdevelopment opportunities at the University of Manitoba.The modules include group discussions and acitivities to help students understand and identify ways to build theirskills and experiences as well as how to articulate theseskills to increase their employability outcomes upongraduation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicBiomedical and Engineering EducationFrench-language works237,207