Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We explored a possible link between the cardiac cycle and the timing of recurrent hiccups in 10 patients with chronic, intractable hiccups. Recordings made during daytime naps in a sleep laboratory included sleep state; electrocardiogram; and respiration by means of a thermistor to detect airflow, bands around the rib cage and abdomen to assess expansion, and a bipolar surface electrode electromyogram over parasternal intercostal muscles. Hiccups could be detected on the abdominal bands and the parasternal electromyogram. The time of occurrence of each hiccup and each R wave in a continuous tracing of 100 or more hiccups were recorded and analyzed together with semiquantitive estimates of the phase of hiccup respiration. Whereas the hiccup rate ranged from approximately one-third to one-eighth of heart rate and was more variable than heart rate, hiccups showed a tendency, stronger in some subjects than others, to occur in midsystole. Variation in R-wave-R-wave (R-R) interval in association with hiccups was found in five patients. In three of these patients, hiccups were synchronized with respiration so that the cyclic change in R-R interval posthiccup could be explained as sinus arrhythmia, but, in two patients, the hiccups were not synchronized with respiration, so that hiccups are most likely responsible for the variation in heart rate. Also, the variation of R-R interval with hiccups suggests that there is some phasic autonomic efferent activity associated with hiccups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it