The effect of visual reliability on auditory–visual integration: an event-related potential study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the neural mechanisms of auditory-visual integration, we recorded event-related potentials during a word-identification task, in which the stimulus was presented in the auditory (A), visual (V), and in the auditory-visual (AV) modalities. The reliability of the visual information varied at the high-reliability (VH) and low-reliability (VL) levels in both the V and AV presentations. The modulation of sensory integrations owing to the variation of cue reliability was revealed in the format of the double-difference waveform generated by subtracting the difference waveform AVL-(A+VL) from the difference waveform AVH-(A+VH). The results demonstrated (i) the early modulation of the activity in the auditory and visual cortex; (ii) subsequent spatial-temporal sequence of activities mostly occurred in multisensory areas; and (iii) the timing of final outputs of AV integration at around 370-410 ms poststimulus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".