MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128445522 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.121363

Left Ventricular Regional Dysfunction Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Without Cardiac Symptoms: Comparison Between Methotrexate and Biologics Treatment Groups

2014· letter· en· W2128445522 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yasuyuki Kobayashi, Hitomi Kobayashi, Masahiro Hirano, Jon T. Giles

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineRheumatoid arthritisRheumatologyCardiologyMagnetic resonance imagingMyocardial infarctionCardiac magnetic resonance imagingMyocarditisTocilizumabSteady-state free precession imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), cardiac involvement such as myocarditis and myocardial infarction is common. This cardiac involvement may have serious consequences and can contribute to worsening of a patient’s cardiac-related morbidity and mortality1,2. Importantly, myocardial disease is typically clinically silent3, only manifesting as myocardial dysfunction after an extended preclinical phase. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a sensitive noninvasive diagnostic technique that can identify subclinical myocardial structural and functional abnormalities. No systematic studies of left ventricular (LV) regional function by CMR have been conducted in patients with RA. We sought to use a CMR approach to detect LV regional dysfunction in RA patients without cardiac symptoms compared to healthy volunteers. Further, we compared LV regional function between patients with RA who were treated with methotrexate (MTX) plus biologics compared to those treated only with MTX. Consecutive patients with RA as defined by the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria were recruited from the outpatient rheumatology clinic at Itabashi Chuo Medical Center between September 2009 and December 2012. Healthy volunteers were also included in the study. Because the regional myocardial function is related to age, we have included only subjects less than 70 years old. All patients with RA received either MTX or MTX plus the biologics infliximab (IFX) or tocilizumab (TCZ). All patients and volunteers underwent nonenhanced CMR with steady-state free-precession (SSFP) cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. … Address correspondence to Dr. Y. Kobayashi, Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan. E-mail: yasukoba2{at}gmail.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207