MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128498965 · doi:10.1002/jmri.21132

MR evidence of long T<sub>2</sub> water in pathological white matter

2007· article· en· W2128498965 on OpenAlexaff
Cornelia Laule, Irene M. Vavasour, Burkhard Mädler, Shannon Kolind, Sandra Sirrs, Elana Brief, Anthony Traboulsee, George R. Moore, David K.B. Li, Alex L. MacKay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite matterMultiple sclerosisHyperintensityPathologicalMedicinePathologyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To describe what, if any, specific long T(2)-related abnormalities occur in the white matter of subjects with either phenylketonuria (PKU) or multiple sclerosis (MS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 48-echo T(2) relaxation data (maximum TE = 1.12 sec) were acquired from 15 PKU subjects, 20 MS subjects, and 15 healthy volunteers. Regions of interest were drawn in diffuse white matter hyperintensities (DiffWM), lesions, normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and normal white matter. Long T(2) maps (200 msec < T(2) < 800 msec) were created for each subject. RESULTS: A new water reservoir with a markedly prolonged T(2) peak was identified in DiffWM and NAWM in 12 out of 15 subjects with PKU and a long T(2) signal was also seen in 23/97 lesions in 50% of subjects with MS. Additionally, a long T(2) component was observed in the corticospinal tracts of 10 healthy volunteers. The characteristics of the long T(2) signal were unique for each subject group. Potential sources of this signal include vacuolation and increases in extracellular water. CONCLUSION: This study supports the usefulness of increasing the data acquisition window of the multiecho T(2) relaxation sequence to better characterize the T(2) decay from pathological brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207