MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2128517811 · doi:10.1177/1073858410390378

Small Changes, Big Impact

2011· review· en· W2128517811 on OpenAlexafffund
Dagmar E. Ehrnhoefer, Liza M. Sutton, Michael R. Hayden

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Neuroscientist · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsChild and Family Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPhosphorylationSUMO proteinPhenotypeProteolysisPalmitoylationHuntingtinUbiquitinBiologyCell biologyKinasePhosphatasePolyglutamine tractChemistryGeneticsEnzymeBiochemistryGeneMutantCysteine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Huntington disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by an elongated polyglutamine tract in huntingtin (htt). htt normally undergoes different posttranslational modifications (PTMs), including phosphorylation, SUMOylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, proteolytic cleavage, and palmitoylation. In the presence of the HD mutation, some PTMs are significantly altered and can result in changes in the clinical phenotype. A rate-limiting PTM is defined as one that can result in significant effects on the phenotype in animal models. For example, the prevention of proteolysis at D586 as well as constitutive phosphorylation at S13 and S16 can obviate the expression of phenotypic features of HD. The enzymes involved in these modifications such as caspase-6, the IκB kinase (IKK) complex, and still to be characterized phosphatases therefore represent promising therapeutic targets for HD. Identifying and testing specific modulators of PTMs now constitute the next big challenges in order to further validate these targets and proceed towards the goal of a mechanism-based treatment for HD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.292
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.067 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations181
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe NeuroscientistSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207